devilgas

nice. should do well.

good job. gotta be in the top 3 as this shows how radial should be done.

needed to have the camera a few inches higher so that the same aspect on the brick tops and underside is seen. as it stands, we can see the lower limit of the cross but not the upper bound.

the vertical throughout trees are killing the radiality you have accomplished with the tyre tracks & electrictiy cables .
also need to check your exposure. the image is underexposed by at least 1 - 2 stops. a common problem when shooting snow scenes.

this has to be the winner for me. completely conveys the idea of the competition and uses objects that are not naturally radial.

blad, planar, bokeh. whatever. what you need to ask yourself is "do my subjects radiate from the centre of the photo?"
sorry dude, but they don't do it for me. ;-)
no disputing it's a nicely exposed shot but i'm not convinced it fits with the contest theme.

ok, it meets the criteria, but the source is naturally radial

i would really have liked to have seen this from a straight on angle rather than to the left of the tower as shot. radial type images are usually helped along with a good smattering of symmetry which this shot doesn't quite achieve.

as with a number of entries, the subject(s) of your photo aren't radiating from the centre.

i'm failing to see anything radiating from the centre. lots of parallel objects does not make radial. having said that, the image is also underexposed by at least 1 - 2 stops. a common problem when shooting snow scenes.

almost there. a little lop sided and the left eye has been cropped out of the image.

again, another entry whose elements are naturally radial. i really want to see something that is along the lines of the themepost that utilises objects that aren't naturally radiating.

ok, it meets the criteria, but the source is naturally radial

ok, it meets the criteria, but the source is naturally radial

welcome to worth! first off, need to get your full view down to about 200k in size. those on dialup won't thank you for the huge image ;-)
i like this image, but the track marks on that egg on the right driv eme nuts! time and again, they draw my eyes to them. ideally, you could've done with another dozen eggs to make the white sheet in the background redundant. nice entry all the same and looking forward to seeing more.

normally i hate seeing photos that use CD's as for me they're just too cliche, however, your use of the CD here is inventive. i'd have perhaps preferred to have not seen the non reflective inner spindle but that would've been harder to pull off. good choice of mono....if nothing else, it avoids me looking at yet another cd created rainbow ;-)

really nice idea and well executed. top 3 placing for sure.

you need to lose the toys. because they are out of focus, they do nothing for the shot at all and just make it appear clumsy. you'd be much better concentrating on the 2 mottled eggs and putting them into a -ve space or other complimentary environment.

for me, this must be the winner. lovely lighting and colours make this image nicely appealing. top job!

the wooden path is very much secondary to the stick. normally, this would be fine, but it should be the main subject in this particular comp. that said, you've got nice use of a shallow DOF and good leading lines.

i'm kinda getting a halfway house with this. i either want to see a lot more contrast or, preferably, a lot less to give that nice subtle bleached look. as it stands, i'm not getting either and get the feeling of being cheated if that makes any sense.
still, nice composition and a well shot subject.

very nice

i can't help but feel that this is a hastily thrown together shot. i'm sure you'll agree that when compared to a number of other entries it doesn't show an abundance of creativity.
you have 3 subjects that are competing for attention. the winner though is the, apparently empty, mug. the use of on-board flash gives the subjects very harsh lighting that do no favours for any of them. perhaps concentrating on the break in the pencil would've worked a bit better?

simple and effective

for this type of shot i want to see perfect symmetry. that means getting the central line vertical and all diagonals entering / exitting on the same horizontal level. the colours / duotone (?) work well although the image looks a little soft.