Mr. Kris Kringle & Co.
1000 Candy Cane Ln.
North Pole, D1225
RE: Contract with Mr. Johnny J. Jones, Jr.
To Whom It May Concern,
You are hereby notified that you are in breach of implicit contract with our client, Johnny J. Jones, Jr. The contract, commencing on the 25th of December, 2005, guarantees our client ample goodies should he behave in a manner deemed “nice,” to be wrapped in colorful sheets of paper, tied with ribbon, and placed beneath his family’s decorated Christmas tree no later than 5:00 am Pacific Standard Time on the 25th of December, 2006. Our client has, by current applicable moral standards, fulfilled his obligation. By law he ought to have received at least seven new, recent-edition, battery-powered, top quality toys valued at no less than $89.95 each. Instead, you delivered a lump of coal.
According to 1953 Holly Jolly Act, paragraph 42.567b, you have thirty days from receipt of this letter to remit the aforementioned goodies. Should you refuse to do so, you must immediately produce concrete proof of our client’s inherent naughtiness or face appropriate legal action.
Only the following will constitute proof:
-Videotaped footage of our client in the act of being naughty.
-Audiotaped footage of our client using naughty language, or conducting himself in a verbally naughty manner.
-Signed, notarized affidavits from no less than five impartial, adult witnesses certifying that our client committed a naughty act.
Moreover, you must supply separate, appropriately documented proof for each calendar day that your firm claims our client was naughty. In accordance with the HJA, paragraph 42.567a, these documents must show our client to have been irrefutably guilty of open, intentional naughtiness for no less than 183 discrete days, or the majority of the calendar year, before they will be accepted as proof of predominantly naughty behavior. Should you provide insufficient or unsatisfactory documentation, we will be forced to pursue further damages for defamation of character.
Be advised that failure to respond to this letter will be interpreted as legally permissible evidence that you and your associates do not, in fact, exist, and you will therefore be guilty of fraud.
We look forward to your cooperation in this matter.
Best Regards,
Ebenezer Sleighchaser, Esq.
Sleighchaser, Sleighchaser & Scrooge, Attorneys at Law